A working sample of how I would translate one of PALSONIFY's hardest concepts into a 5-minute microlearning that holds up to a director's TLO/ELO/check audit.
Open the worked exampleTwenty years across higher education, K-12 systems, and adult learning. The throughline is the same: design that respects the learner's intelligence and proves itself in performance.
I have spent two decades designing learning that has to land the first time. Public school systems do not get to A/B test a unit on civics. Adult learners do not have time to wade through filler. I would bring that same discipline to Crinetics: respect for the learner's time, and content that proves itself in the field.
I treat instructional design as a partnership with science. The MoA is not mine to invent. The patient story is not mine to fictionalize. My craft is to make complex truth land cleanly with the people who need to act on it.
Learning happens in relationship. I design with the people who will use what I build, and I report back to them on what worked. The team is my rubric, not the LMS dashboard. This value carried me through international education reform, school-wide SEL implementation, and every adult-learning project since.
The best learning starts from a real problem the learner already cares about. Not "here are eight facts about acromegaly," but "here is the conversation you are about to walk into with an endocrinologist. What will you do?" PBLWorks/BIE certified, and the orientation has shaped every design I have led, K-12 through adult.
Design starts with the human, not the content. Who is the learner? What are they carrying when they sit down? What do they need to walk away holding? The content serves them, never the other way around. In a regulated environment, this is the value that keeps compliance from becoming compliance theater.
The science changes. The standards change. The regulations change. In healthcare and life sciences, what was right last year may need updating tomorrow. I design training that holds its shape under shifting requirements: modular pieces that adapt without rebuilding from scratch, claims that can be re-cited cleanly, and a workflow built to absorb new MLR feedback as a feature, not a fire.
These are the eight checks I run on my own work before any director ever sees it.
Every 90 seconds of passive content earns its place by being followed by an active doing moment.
Every chunk states the topic AND why it matters. Learners always know why before they invest attention.
Every module has one Terminal Learning Objective and the building steps that get there. Both are measurable, written in Mager format.
The end-of-module check tests the actual TLO, not adjacent knowledge. If the check fails to verify the TLO, the module failed.
Multiple choice maxes out at 20% of any knowledge check. The other 80% is doing.
A single touch teaches nothing. Day 1, 7, 14, 30 pulses are how content becomes behavior.
Every claim has a citation. Every visual is brand-compliant. Every script is built to be revised in pieces.
Public AI for public knowledge. Copilot for M365 for internal IP. Synthesia Enterprise for video. Nothing leaves the tenant that should not.
Sample microlearning example, designed using ATD CPTD methodology and Mager performance objectives. Built as an interactive walkthrough so a director can audit the TLO, ELOs, and end-of-module check in one sitting.
PALSONIFY targets one somatostatin receptor with extreme selectivity. That selectivity is what reduces side effects compared with older drugs that hit multiple receptors at once. This 5-minute microlearning teaches one rep how to explain that to one HCP in 30 seconds, without notes.
SO WHAT
Self-assessment now will let you see growth at the end. The whole point of this 5 minutes is to take you from "I think I sort of get it" to "I can say it in 30 seconds, in my own voice, to an endocrinologist."
SO WHAT
Every cell in your body has tiny "locks" built into its surface. The medical word is receptors. Hormones float around the body like keys looking for the right lock to fit into. When a key clicks into a lock, it sends a signal inside the cell that tells the cell what to do: grow, slow down, release a hormone, stop releasing one.
The endocrine system uses a hormone called somatostatin as the body's natural "off switch" for growth hormone. Somatostatin's job is to tell the pituitary to stop making growth hormone. Somatostatin happens to fit into five different lock types in the body, called SSTR1 through SSTR5. That is what the five doors are. Each door controls something different in the body.
SO WHAT
A master key opens every door. The PALSONIFY key only fits one. PALSONIFY is 4,000 times more likely to fit door #2 than any of the other four doors. That is the selectivity figure HCPs care about. Click and drag each key card on the left into the matching effect zone on the right.
SO WHAT
This is where biology becomes patient experience. When a drug only opens the door it is supposed to open, fewer unintended things happen in the body. This is the line that lands with HCPs.
The body has five somatostatin receptors. Older drugs hit all five at once, which controls the disease but causes side effects from the four receptors we did not need to touch. PALSONIFY is designed to fit only the second receptor with 4,000-fold selectivity, which means fewer side effects from the receptors that were never the target.
SO WHAT · THIS IS THE CHECK
The TLO said you would be able to explain this in 30 seconds, without notes, using the lock-and-key analogy. This is where you prove it. Record yourself. Listen back. Self-rate against the rubric. Re-record if you need to.
Three facts to remember from ELO 1 and ELO 2:
Ready? Record yourself in 30 seconds.
SO WHAT
Listen back to your recording. Check each criterion you met. A passing recording hits at least 6 of 7. If you scored fewer, go back to the recorder and try again before submitting to your manager.
Pharma L&D is a regulated environment. AI-generated content in training is a growing area of scrutiny. This attestation is separate from the 7-point rubric on purpose. It is not about your performance. It is about the integrity of the recording.
SO WHAT
Compare your starting confidence to where you are now. Then commit to one specific HCP conversation this week where you will use the lock-and-key explanation.
Your commitment is captured for your manager dashboard. They will check in with you at your next 1:1 to ask how the conversation went. That is the spaced reinforcement loop that turns one microlearning into actual behavior change.
Each row is its own microlearning with its own TLO and ELOs. The pathway adds spacing and reinforcement, not extra content inside any single asset. Click any row to expand the ELOs.
I will not propose a strategy until I have inventoried the systems, walked through the MLR process end to end, and met every stakeholder L&D depends on.
Onboarding, system access, stakeholder listening tour, MLR walkthrough, content audit. End of month: one quick-win asset shipped through MLR.
Lock the pathway architecture. Build the worked example. Validate the MLR workflow. Stand up the measurement framework.
Build the remaining microlearnings in two-week sprints. Stand up Day 7, 14, 30, 60 reinforcement pulses. Document the production playbook as the leave-behind.